http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1914692207624681889&q=fifth+gear

I've seen that before, I wonder why they didn't use a repsol rc211? they had thier badest car and boat why not badest bike?

by the way welcome back, you haven't been on here in a while

Twas cool though!

Thanks 1WheelMax yeah need to get over hear more often.

that was a bullshit test......race boat vs race car vs stock bike???? c'mon, whats that about. even though the bike did very good it's still goin up against a 900 hp race car, lol.....who do you think is gonna win, lol.

my thoughts exactly ...

my thoughts exactly ...


2nd that

kinda what max said
I've seen that before, I wonder why they didn't use a repsol rc211? they had thier badest car and boat why not badest bike?
or exactly what he said

the RC211V would have taken that shit down.

so lets take a survey......900hp race car, or a rc211v.....whos gonna win???

so lets take a survey......900hp race car, or a rc211v.....whos gonna win???

me, on a pocket bike with a turbo on it.

so lets take a survey......900hp race car, or a rc211v.....whos gonna win???

me, on a pocket bike with a turbo on it.

that didn't really make sense. a top of the line Indy car against a stock bike. it freakin better beat the stock bike by more than a second. it sure wasn't a big enough win to do a donut over. i'd be embarrased.

That was Jenson Button's F1 car. The craziest part about that car isn't even the power it is the down force and handling. The RC211 would have put up a good fight but I think the car still would have one, especially if the launch control would have been working. If you compare lap times of a Moto gp bike and an F1 car around the same track the car will be a good bit faster. That being said I still would rather ride the bike.

how about that turbo 1100XX that holds the pro-street record? 7.422 i think it is. that would waste the car.